United Nations
Article
United Nations is a recurring organization in the Astral Codex Ten archive, appearing 8 times across 8 issues between May 10, 2021 and January 16, 2026. The archive places it in contexts such as “Gamergate… somehow ended up in front of the United Nations”; “We have worked with the UN and the OECD”; “international law on this question centers around a UN-backed covenant”. It most often appears alongside New York Times, Trump, United States.
Metadata
- Category: Organizations
- Mention count: 8
- Issue count: 8
- First seen: May 10, 2021
- Last seen: January 16, 2026
Appears In
- The Rise And Fall Of Online Culture Wars
- ACX Grants ++: The First Half
- Who Gets Self-Determination?
- Highlights From The Comments On Self-Determination
- Your Book Review: The Internationalists
- Galton, Ehrlich, Buck
- Interview Day At Thiel Capital
- The Dilbert Afterlife
Related Pages
-
- New York Times (4 shared issues)
-
- Trump (4 shared issues)
-
- United States (4 shared issues)
-
- China (3 shared issues)
-
- Germany (3 shared issues)
-
- Google (3 shared issues)
-
- Hitler (3 shared issues)
-
- India (3 shared issues)
-
- Israel (3 shared issues)
-
- Putin (3 shared issues)
-
- Russia (3 shared issues)
-
- Spain (3 shared issues)
External Links
Source Context
Recovered passages from the original issue text. When the raw archive preserved outbound links inside the source passage, they are listed directly under the quote.
For a while, this meant geek feminists had vast society-wide power, and so the mainstream ended up embroiled in what would otherwise have been niche geek issues. The obvious example of this was Gamergate, where some geeky gamer women and geeky gamer men got angry at each other and it somehow ended up in front of the United Nations. But that was a high-water mark. After that the geek feminist culture started to fade.
Inline links: it somehow ended up in front of the United Nations
#38: Promote Citizens’ Assemblies And Lotteries The newDemocracy Foundation is an organisation in Australia that develops, demonstrates, and promotes innovations in democracy. Its focus is on deliberative democracy and random selection. We have worked with the UN and the OECD to develop international standards of best practice and founded the Democracy R&D network. We’re designed and operated ground-breaking projects in Melbourne, Geelong, and Canberra, and have collaborated with international partners in Brazil, Spain, North Macedonia, and Malawi. We require funding to take advantage of an opportunity in Australian politics. Citizens’ assemblies and democratic lottery are gaining traction but the ecosystem for their implementation still requires support and training that is best provided by an independent organisation like ours. Additional funding could allow us to expand our project capacity, conduct needed research or improve our advocacy and reach to politicians. I’m happy to answer any questions or provide a brief organisation overview, you can reach me at kyle.redman@newdemocracy.com.au You can view our website here: www.newdemocracy.com.au.
...to “deserve” independence. But any such debate is inherently subjective. Does Texas qualify? Kurdistan? Scotland? Palestine? How should we know? II. As best I can tell, international law on this question centers around a UN-backed covenant which says that “all peoples have the right to self-determination”. So are Texans/Kurds/Scots/Palestinians a “people”? International law makes no effort to answer this q...
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
In The Internationalists, Oona Hathaway and Scott Shapiro (H&S from now on) work to raise the profile of the 1928 Kellogg-Briand Peace Pact, at the time the most-ratified treaty in history, in which 63 nations (unlike today, this was most of the world - 51 became founding members of the United Nations) came together to declare war illegal. Here is the Pact, in full.
Inline links: The Internationalists
H&S profile a number of people who were involved in the creation of the Pact, and the followup that happened throughout World War II, eventually culminating in the creation of the United Nations. Here are the chief ones, briefly:
Henry Stimson was a diplomat who became Secretary of State and later Secretary of War for Roosevelt. He wielded immense power as Secretary of War, and advocated for the creation of the United Nations as a tool to enforce the Peace Pact after the war.
Inline links: Henry Stimson
Luckily for Ehrlich, no one cares. He remains a professor emeritus at Stanford, and president of Stanford’s Center for Conservation Biology. He has won practically every environmental award imaginable, including from the Sierra Club, the World Wildlife Fund, and the United Nations (all > 10 years after the Indian sterilization campaign he endorsed). He won the MacArthur “Genius” Prize ($800,000) in 1990, the Crafoord Prize ($700,000, presented by the King of Sweden) that same year, and was made a Fellow of the Royal Society in 2012. He was recently interviewed on 60 Minutes about the importance of sustainability; the mass sterilization campaign never came up. He is about as honored and beloved as it’s possible for a public intellectual to get.
“The world order is controlled by a group of diplomats who meet at the United Nations. Einstein didn’t kill himself. The Cuban Missile Crisis was a Communist plot to undermine the United States.”
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
Backlinks
- ACX Grants ++: The First Half
- Confederacy
- Galton, Ehrlich, Buck
- Highlights From The Comments On Self-Determination
- Interview Day At Thiel Capital
- New Atheism
- Organizations: U
- racism
- The Dilbert Afterlife
- The Rise And Fall Of Online Culture Wars
- Who Gets Self-Determination?
- Your Book Review: The Internationalists