Eugenics movement
Article
Eugenics movement is a recurring concept in the Astral Codex Ten archive, appearing 2 times across 2 issues between April 16, 2021 and July 25, 2023. The archive places it in contexts such as “This philosophy was the energizing intellectual force behind both the Eugenics movement and Nazi Germany”; “that set of beliefs was the grounding for the eugenics movement and played a huge role in historical abuses”. It most often appears alongside Ireland, Scott, Wikipedia.
Metadata
- Category: Concepts
- Mention count: 2
- Issue count: 2
- First seen: April 16, 2021
- Last seen: July 25, 2023
Appears In
Related Pages
-
- Ireland (2 shared issues)
-
- Scott (2 shared issues)
-
- Wikipedia (2 shared issues)
-
- “The Rent Is Too Damn High!” (1 shared issues)
-
- 16th amendment (1 shared issues)
-
- 1886 (1 shared issues)
-
- 1897 (1 shared issues)
-
- 1992 Presidential debate (1 shared issues)
-
- ABA (1 shared issues)
-
- Adam Perry (1 shared issues)
-
- Adam Smith (1 shared issues)
-
- Adesh Thapliyal (1 shared issues)
External Links
Source Context
Recovered passages from the original issue text. When the raw archive preserved outbound links inside the source passage, they are listed directly under the quote.
..."fit" tend to perish, and furthermore, this brutal process will actively "improve" the human race. This philosophy was the energizing intellectual force behind both the Eugenics movement and Nazi Germany. George clearly hates everything about this philosophy but attempts to steel-man it anyways: The Malthusian doctrine, as at present held, may be thus st...
...doing well do so because they are more "fit", and those that are less "fit" tend to perish, and furthermore, this brutal process will actively "improve" the human race. This philosophy was the energizing intellectual force behind both the Eugenics movement and Nazi Germany. George clearly hates everything about this philosophy but attempts to steel-man it anyways: The Malthusian doctrine, as at present held, may be thus stated in its stron...
The Medical Model exactly as stated (with the "you must stigmatize people with disabilities" part included) was hugely historically popular, and calling it a straw man is only true insofar as the real people who believed it have (mostly) died off. Although it wasn't called the "medical model" at the time, that set of beliefs was the grounding for the eugenics movement and played a huge role in historical abuses of disabled people. I think Deafness is a really good example of this. The oral education of Deaf people imposed on them by hearing doctors didn't work, because there WAS no medical remedy for deafness at the time. The Cochlear implant is relatively recent, and it's not a flawless solution. In the place of the actual practice of medicine was inhumane education, which determined the worth of a Deaf person by how well they could learn how to speak, as opposed to recognizing sign language as an actual valid language with a grammar and so on. This is the ideal example of the social model versus the medical model - Deaf people were never "incapable" of speech, rather, hearing educators at the time, influenced by Alexander Graham Bell's theories of eugenics, were incapable of recognizing that the Deaf were perfectly proficient in sign language. A medical inadequacy, solved by a social solution.