MIT
Article
MIT is a recurring organization in the Astral Codex Ten archive, appearing 18 times across 18 issues between April 30, 2021 and September 11, 2025. The archive places it in contexts such as “Vernon D. Tate … who went to become chief librarian at MIT”; “wrote the MIT economist Morris Adelman”; “They’re especially trying to expand the student groups at Harvard and MIT”. It most often appears alongside California, Harvard, Japan.
Metadata
- Category: Organizations
- Mention count: 18
- Issue count: 18
- First seen: April 30, 2021
- Last seen: September 11, 2025
Appears In
- Your Book Review: Double Fold
- Your Book Review: The Wizard And The Prophet
- Boston Meetup This Sunday
- ACX Grants Results
- ACX Grants ++: The First Half
- Your Book Review: The Future Of Fusion Energy
- Highlights From The Comments On The Central Valley
- Highlights From The Comments On Bobos In Paradise
- Who Predicted 2022?
- Links For March 2023
- Your Book Review: Safe Enough?
- Highlights From The Comments On Elon Musk
- Seems Like Targeting
- Practically-A-Book Review: Rootclaim $100,000 Lab Leak Debate
- Links for May 2024
- Your Book Review: Dominion
- Lives Of The Rationalist Saints
- Book Review: If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies
Related Pages
-
- California (6 shared issues)
-
- Harvard (6 shared issues)
-
- Japan (5 shared issues)
-
- United States (5 shared issues)
-
- US (5 shared issues)
-
- Wikipedia (5 shared issues)
-
- ACX (4 shared issues)
-
- America (4 shared issues)
-
- COVID (4 shared issues)
-
- Eliezer Yudkowsky (4 shared issues)
-
- Elon Musk (4 shared issues)
-
- Israel (4 shared issues)
External Links
Source Context
Recovered passages from the original issue text. When the raw archive preserved outbound links inside the source passage, they are listed directly under the quote.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
In "Fire," the line between Wizardry and Prophetry seems the most slippery – is solar power an example of a cutting-edge technological solution to a seemingly intractable growth problem (in which case it would be firmly in the Wizard camp) or an environmentally-friendly alternative to "dirty" Wizard technology like fracking and nuclear power plants (in which case, it should belong to the Prophets)? Mann places it more in the Prophet category, but an important point he makes is that, before fears of climate change displaced the locus of the argument surrounding oil, the Prophets’ party line was that alternative "clean" energy solutions like solar were desperately needed because the stock of oil in the world was running out – which so far has proven to be untrue. Much like "we’re running out of room for all these people!" or "we’re running out of space to house all this garbage!" this zombie conviction persisted for decades and seemed resistant to any evidence to the contrary. But if (big if!) carbon emission were of no concern, Wizards would have neatly won this fight through their development of more sophisticated oil extraction techniques and more energy-efficient machines, turning oil supply into a Zeno’s Paradox. Mann: "‘It is commonly asked, when will the world’s supply of oil be exhausted?’ wrote the MIT economist Morris Adelman. ‘The best one-word answer: never.’ On its face, this seems ridiculous – how could a finite stock be inexhaustible, when a constantly renewed flow can run out? But more than a century of experience has shown it to be true. [...] That is, fossil fuel supplies have no known bounds."
Some rationalist/EA leaders are focusing on Boston right now as a promising place to community-build. They’re especially trying to expand the student groups at Harvard and MIT. If you live in Boston and/or attend either of those colleges, then - whether or not you can make it Sunday - consider giving them your name through this form so they can help get you connected.
Inline links: this form
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
No direct inline source block was recovered for this mention.
Backlinks
- ACX Grants ++: The First Half
- ACX Grants Results
- Book Review: If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies
- Boston Meetup This Sunday
- Columbia
- Concepts: M
- Ford
- George W. Bush
- Highlights From The Comments On Bobos In Paradise
- Highlights From The Comments On Elon Musk
- Highlights From The Comments On The Central Valley
- Links For March 2023
- Links for May 2024
- Lives Of The Rationalist Saints
- mink
- NIMBYs
- Organizations: M
- Philipp Markolin
- Practically-A-Book Review: Rootclaim $100,000 Lab Leak Debate
- Seems Like Targeting
- Stanford
- Tolkien
- Who Predicted 2022?
- Your Book Review: Dominion
- Your Book Review: Double Fold
- Your Book Review: Safe Enough?
- Your Book Review: The Future Of Fusion Energy
- Your Book Review: The Wizard And The Prophet