OJ
Article
OJ is a recurring person in the Astral Codex Ten archive, appearing 2 times across 2 issues between October 10, 2024 and February 21, 2025. The archive places it in contexts such as “with all the ferocity of OJ vowing to find the real killer”; “And with all the ferocity of OJ vowing to find the real killer”; “Which is more likely - that OJ killed his wife?“. It most often appears alongside /r/slatestarcodex, 80,000 Hours, @GroundHogStrat.
Metadata
- Category: People
- Mention count: 2
- Issue count: 2
- First seen: October 10, 2024
- Last seen: February 21, 2025
Appears In
Related Pages
-
- slatestarcodex (1 shared issues)
-
- 80,000 Hours (1 shared issues)
-
- @GroundHogStrat (1 shared issues)
-
- A.I. salons (1 shared issues)
-
- ACX (1 shared issues)
-
- Adam McKay (1 shared issues)
-
- Adrian (1 shared issues)
-
- ADUs (1 shared issues)
-
- al-Qaeda (1 shared issues)
-
- Alphabet (1 shared issues)
-
- Andreessen Horowitz (1 shared issues)
-
- Anthropic (1 shared issues)
External Links
Source Context
Recovered passages from the original issue text. When the raw archive preserved outbound links inside the source passage, they are listed directly under the quote.
Newsom is good at politics, so he’s covering his tracks. To counterbalance his SB 1047 veto and appear strong on AI, he signed several less important anti-AI bills, including a ban on deepfakes which was immediately struck down as unconstitutional. And with all the ferocity of OJ vowing to find the real killer, he’s set up a committee to come up with better AI safety regulation. He’s named a few committee members already, most notably Fei-Fei Li:
What we really do when debating hypotheses isn’t wait to see which ones will be falsified, it’s comparing simplicity - Occam’s Razor. Which is more likely - that OJ killed his wife? Or that some other killer developed a deep hatred for OJ’s wife, faked OJ’s appearance, faked his DNA, then vanished into thin air? Does this depend on the police having some piece of evidence left in reserve which they haven’t told the theory-crafters, that they can bring out at a dramatic moment to “falsify” the latter theory? No. Perhaps OJ’s defense team formulated the second-killer theory so that none of the evidence presented at the trial could falsify it. Rejecting it requires us to determine that it deserves a complexity penalty relative to the simple theory that OJ was the killer and everything is straightforwardly as it seems.