Stein
Article
Stein is a recurring person in the Astral Codex Ten archive, appearing 2 times across 2 issues between April 19, 2021 and October 30, 2024. The archive places it in contexts such as “In SSC Endorses Clinton, Johnson, Or Stein I wrote about my reasons for opposing Trump”; “ACX recommends voting for … Stein”. It most often appears alongside Democrats, Democrats, Donald Trump.
Metadata
- Category: People
- Mention count: 2
- Issue count: 2
- First seen: April 19, 2021
- Last seen: October 30, 2024
Appears In
Related Pages
-
- Democrats (2 shared issues)
-
- Democrats (2 shared issues)
-
- Donald Trump (2 shared issues)
-
- Hillary Clinton (2 shared issues)
-
- Israel (2 shared issues)
-
- Joe Biden (2 shared issues)
-
- Kamala Harris (2 shared issues)
-
- Republican Party (2 shared issues)
-
- Richard Spencer (2 shared issues)
-
- Trump (2 shared issues)
-
- [[entities/concept/resistance|#Resistance]] (1 shared issues)
-
- 2019 government shut down (1 shared issues)
External Links
Source Context
Recovered passages from the original issue text. When the raw archive preserved outbound links inside the source passage, they are listed directly under the quote.
In SSC Endorses Clinton, Johnson, Or Stein I wrote about my reasons for opposing Trump. There's a lot in here and I'll try to extract relevant-prediction-shaped things - but be sure to read the post to see how honest you think I'm being in my extractions.
Inline links: SSC Endorses Clinton, Johnson, Or Stein
Time to own the libs! ACX joins such based heterodox thinkers as Curtis Yarvin, Nick Fuentes, Richard Spencer, and David Duke in telling you what the woke Washington Post and failing LA Times don’t want you to know: Donald Trump is the wrong choice for US President.
Inline links: Curtis Yarvin, Nick Fuentes, Richard Spencer, David Duke, the woke Washington Post, LA Times
I mostly stand by the reasoning in my 2016 post, Slate Star Codex Endorses Clinton, Johnson, Or Stein. But you can read a better and more recent argument against Trump’s economic policy here, and against his foreign policy here. You can read an argument that Trump is a dangerous authoritarian here.
One worry is that Trump tries to pack election boards with his supporters and give them a mandate to fiddle with election law in ways that make him more likely to win (I don’t claim Democrats never do this, just that Trump has openly endorsed doing it orders of magnitude more). This probably can’t swing 60-40 elections, but it might swing 51-49 elections, and nowadays almost every election is 51-49.