FT
Article
FT is a recurring publication in the Astral Codex Ten archive, appearing 3 times across 3 issues between April 14, 2021 and December 23, 2021. The archive places it in contexts such as “Or FT: An Investor’s Prosperity Vision For Honduras”; “FT and NYT have more on this”; “FT published this article”. It most often appears alongside Austria, Congress, Europe.
Metadata
- Category: Publications
- Mention count: 3
- Issue count: 3
- First seen: April 14, 2021
- Last seen: December 23, 2021
Appears In
Related Pages
-
- Austria (2 shared issues)
-
- Congress (2 shared issues)
-
- Europe (2 shared issues)
-
- Germany (2 shared issues)
-
- Alaska (1 shared issues)
-
- Alcsutdoboz (1 shared issues)
-
- Allied Powers (1 shared issues)
-
- America (1 shared issues)
-
- Amisulpride (1 shared issues)
-
- anarcho-capitalist (1 shared issues)
-
- Angela Merkel (1 shared issues)
-
- Arizona Supreme Court (1 shared issues)
External Links
Source Context
Recovered passages from the original issue text. When the raw archive preserved outbound links inside the source passage, they are listed directly under the quote.
...ou might have read about them last month in Bloomberg: A Private Tech City Opens For Business In Honduras . Or in NACLA: A Private Government In Honduras Moves Forward . Or FT: An Investor's Prosperity Vision For Honduras . I read all of this and still didn't feel like I quite understood what was going on. Then a fortuitious mistake led me to an email exchange with Trey Goff, Próspera's e...
...big fan , and gave him a softball interview . Rod Dreher writes that “Viktor Orban’s Hungary, whatever its flaws, and whatever his flaws, is the place to be right now”. FT and NYT have more on this, obviously. You can like a dictator’s policies without necessarily admiring his dictatorship. I myself am a fan of Lee Kuan Yew, not always the most liberal guy. Still,...
The day after I wrote The Phrase “No Evidence” Is A Red Flag For Bad Science Communication , FT published this article : Like many uses of “no evidence”, they meant that one particular study of this complicated question had failed to reject the null hypothesis. Here’s what happened to Me...