Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Article

Nature Reviews Neuroscience is a recurring publication in the Astral Codex Ten archive, appearing 2 times across 2 issues between August 14, 2025 and October 17, 2025. The archive places it in contexts such as “[19] …Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 687–700, Nov. 2018”; “The probabilistic model of Alzheimer disease: The amyloid hypothesis revised,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience”; “who has published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience”. It most often appears alongside Science, SpaceX, 80,000 Hours.

Metadata

• Category: Publications
• Mention count: 2
• Issue count: 2
• First seen: August 14, 2025
• Last seen: October 17, 2025

Appears In

• In Defense Of The Amyloid Hypothesis
• Non-Book Review Contest 2025 Winners

Related Pages

• • Science (2 shared issues)
• • SpaceX (2 shared issues)
• • 80,000 Hours (1 shared issues)
• • A. Bejanin (1 shared issues)
• • A. de Calignon (1 shared issues)
• • A. Elobeid (1 shared issues)
• • A. J. Aschenbrenner (1 shared issues)
• • A. L. Woerman (1 shared issues)
• • A. M. Pooler (1 shared issues)
• • A. Ritter (1 shared issues)
• • A. W. Bero (1 shared issues)
• • AAIC (1 shared issues)

External Links

• • http://web.archive.org/web/20221104130431/https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/1m-bet-rules
• • http://web.archive.org/web/20221129133112/https://blog.rootclaim.com/rootclaim-accepts-500000-challenge-on-covid-vaccine-safety-efficacy/
• • http://web.archive.org/web/20221224061743/https://www.skirsch.com/covid/SaarWilf.pdf
• • https://archive.ph/pY4gF#selection-663.103-683.190
• • https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/030913258601000109?journalCode=phgb
• • https://progressandpoverty.substack.com/p/book-review-the-land-trap-by-mike
• • https://web.archive.org/web/20230104080248/https://www.rootclaim.com/
• • https://whimsi.substack.com/p/book-review-the-emperor
• • https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/book-review-the-alexander-romance
• • https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/secrets-of-the-great-families
• • https://www.datasecretslox.com/index.php/topic,4082.0.html
• • https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07552-4

Source Context

Recovered passages from the original issue text. When the raw archive preserved outbound links inside the source passage, they are listed directly under the quote.

In Defense Of The Amyloid Hypothesis

August 14, 2025 · Original source

[19] W. Jagust, “Imaging the evolution and pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 687–700, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0067-3.

Inline links: 10.1038/s41583-018-0067-3

[67] G. B. Frisoni et al., “The probabilistic model of Alzheimer disease: The amyloid hypothesis revised,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 53–66, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00533-w.

Inline links: 10.1038/s41583-021-00533-w

Non-Book Review Contest 2025 Winners

October 17, 2025 · Original source

Mice, Mechanisms, And Dementia, by Myka Estes. Myka is a neuroscientist and immunologist who has published in Science, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, and Immunity. She currently manages a research lab focused on children with profound neurodevelopmental disorders and publishes the Journal Club with Myka Substack. She’s also in the process of launching an independent bookstore, and in her spare time - she has no spare time.

Inline links: Mice, Mechanisms, And Dementia, Journal Club with Myka

Backlinks

• In Defense Of The Amyloid Hypothesis
• Non-Book Review Contest 2025 Winners
• Publications: N