Harper’s
Article
Harper’s is a recurring publication in the Astral Codex Ten archive, appearing 2 times across 2 issues between February 23, 2026 and March 02, 2026. The archive places it in contexts such as “I was recently mentioned in a Harper’s article on Bay Area AI culture”; “The Harper’s fact-checker asked me if this was true”; “I think I got my tone wrong on last week’s Open Thread and made people think I was condemning the Harper’s article that mentioned me”. It most often appears alongside ACX, Astralcodexten Com, Bay Area.
Metadata
- Category: Publications
- Mention count: 2
- Issue count: 2
- First seen: February 23, 2026
- Last seen: March 02, 2026
Appears In
Related Pages
-
- ACX (2 shared issues)
-
- Astralcodexten Com (1 shared issues)
-
- Bay Area (1 shared issues)
-
- Bio Anchors (1 shared issues)
-
- Cambridge Digital Minds (1 shared issues)
-
- Cambridge UK (1 shared issues)
-
- Cotra (1 shared issues)
-
- David Schneider-Joseph (1 shared issues)
-
- LinkedIn (1 shared issues)
-
- Manifold Markets (1 shared issues)
-
- MNX (1 shared issues)
-
- Prague (1 shared issues)
External Links
Source Context
Recovered passages from the original issue text. When the raw archive preserved outbound links inside the source passage, they are listed directly under the quote.
4: I was recently mentioned in a Harper’s article on Bay Area AI culture. I agreed to be included, it’s basically fine, I’m not objecting to it, but a few small issues, mostly quibbles with emphasis rather than fact:
Inline links: a Harper’s article on Bay Area AI culture
The piece says rationalists believe “that to reach the truth you have to abandon all existing modes of knowledge acquisition and start again from scratch”. The Harper’s fact-checker asked me if this was true and I emphatically said it wasn’t, so I’m not sure what’s going on here.
2: I think I got my tone wrong on last week’s Open Thread and made people think I was condemning the Harper’s article that mentioned me. I actually liked it and was just trying to clarify a few points. Please don’t get angry about it on my behalf. So as to not make things worse, I’ll banish further discussion of this to a comment.
Inline links: comment