Astral Codex Ten

arXiv

3 min read

arXiv

Article

arXiv is a recurring publication in the Astral Codex Ten archive, appearing 2 times across 2 issues between May 20, 2022 and April 17, 2023. The archive places it in contexts such as “preprint servers like arXiv”; “we can publish all our findings on the ArXIV”. It most often appears alongside Advarra, Aldous Huxley, Alexander Macmillan.

Metadata

  • Category: Publications
  • Mention count: 2
  • Issue count: 2
  • First seen: May 20, 2022
  • Last seen: April 17, 2023

Appears In

Source Context

Recovered passages from the original issue text. When the raw archive preserved outbound links inside the source passage, they are listed directly under the quote.

Your Book Review: Making Nature
May 20, 2022 · Original source
The world of scientific publishing is organized as a hierarchy of status, much like the hierarchy of angels in the Abrahamic religions. At the bottom are the non-peer-reviewed blog posts and Twitter threads. Slightly above are the preprint servers like arXiv, and then big peer-reviewed journals like PLOS One. Above those are all the field-specific journals, some with higher reputation than others. And at the top, near the divine presence, are the CNS journals: Cell, Nature, and Science.
There’s no question that the web has profoundly changed the way scientists interact with scientific results. But interestingly, the instantaneousness of online publication — whether on blogs, in the comments below an article, in social media, or on a preprint server like arXiv and bioRxiv — hasn’t affected Nature very much. We might have naïvely expected that it would have tried to keep up with the new platforms, since speed was its comparative advantage. But it didn’t. And that hasn’t made it obsolete, either.
Inline links: arXiv, bioRxiv
Highlights From The Comments On IRBs
April 17, 2023 · Original source
But I think a lot of AI development is genuinely not linked to the federal funding spigot. If the government passed an IRB law based off how things work in medicine, I think OpenAI could say “We’re not receiving federal funding, we can publish all our findings on the ArXIV, and we don’t care about the FDA, you have no power over us”. I don’t know if some branch of the government has enough power to mandate everyone use IRBs regardless of their funding source.